Map of Nepal, Printed in India

Map of Nepal, Printed in India

Buddhi Narayan Shrestha

Annapurna-1Annapurna-2

Advertisements

Limpiyadhura Missing in Map

Limpiyadhura Missing in Map

 

Annapurna

Trouble by Indian Construction

Trouble by Indian Construction

Buddhi Narayan Shrestha

 

Kantipur- Bharatiya Samrachanale Sasti 75-5-18

Nepal India Porous Border Must Be Regulated

Nepal India Porous Border Must Be Regulated

Buddhi Narayan Shrestha

नेपाल भारत सीमा हृवाङ्ङै भयो, नियमन गर्नुपर्छ

भारतले एकतर्फी सीमा नियन्त्रण गर्दैछ, ईपीजीको प्रतिवेदनमा के ?

बुद्धिनारायण श्रेष्ठ

www.Onlinekhabar.com

२०७५ भदौ २० गते     १८:२५ मा प्रकाशित

विश्वमा तीन प्रकारका सीमा व्यवस्थाहरु प्रचलनमा छन् । एउटा खुला, अर्को नियन्त्रित (रेगुलेटेड) र अर्को बन्द सीमा । छोटकरीमा बुझ्दा नेपाल र भारतबीचको सीमाना खुला हो । नेपाल र चीनबीचको सीमा नियन्त्रित र उत्तरकोरिया-दक्षिण कोरियाको बन्द सीमा हो ।

नियमन (नियन्त्रित) व्यवस्था भनेको भिसा, पासपोर्ट परिचयपत्र देखाउनुपर्ने खालको हो । चीनको ३० किलोमिटरसम्म जाँदा पहिले नेपालीलाई भिसा, पासपोर्ट चाहिँदैनथ्यो । १ जनवरी २००७ देखि आईडी कार्ड सिष्टम लगाएको छ ।

Khula Sima-2.jpg

अब नेपाल र भारतबीचको खुला सीमानाको चर्चा गरौं ।

खुला सीमाले प्रशस्त अवसर पनि दिएको छ र हदैसम्मको चुनौती पनि खडा गरिदिएको छ । अवसरको कुरा गर्दा अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय सीमा तत्काल पार गरेर दुबैतिरका नागरिक आफन्त भेट्न जान पाउँछन् । विपदका बेलामा सहयोग लिन सजिलो हुन्छ । उदाहरणको रुपमा ७ वर्षअघि इलामको पशुपतिनगर बजारमा ठूलो आगलागी भयो । त्यहाँ आधा घण्टामा दार्जीलिङबाट दमकल आएर आगो निभायो । इलाम सदरमुकामबाट गएको दमकल भोलिपल्टमात्र पुगेको थियो ।

सिरहाको आँखा अस्पतालमा धेरै भारतीय बिरामीहरु आएर उपचार लिन्छन् । बिराटनगरमा धान काट्नुपर्‍यो भने भारतीय श्रमिक आउँछन्, रोप्नुपर्‍यो भने पनि आइपुग्छन् ।

हाम्रा राजनीतिक दलका नेताहरुले नेपाल र भारतबीच रोटीबेटीको सम्बन्ध छ भन्नुहुन्छ । नेपालका छोरी भारतका बुहारी भएकी छन् । भारतको छोरा नेपालका ज्वाइँ भएका छन् ।

खुला सीमानाको अर्को पाटो पनि छ । यसलाई अवाञ्छित तत्वले हदैसम्म दुरुपयोग गरेको छ । खुला सीमाका कारण क्रस बोर्डर टेरजिम (सीमापार आतंकवाद) र क्रम बोर्डर क्राइम (सीमापार अपराध) अत्यधिक भएको छ । भारतमा खून खराबा गर्छन् र नेपालमा पसेपछि सुरक्षित हुन्छन् । विध्वंशकारीले नेपालमा योजना बनाउँछन् । भारतमा गएर बम पड्काउँछन् ।

ईपीजीको पाँचौं बैठकमा भारतका तर्फबाट सदस्य रहेका डा. भीसी उप्रेतीले  (BC Upreti) ठाडै प्रपोज गर्नुभयो- दुई देशबीचको सीमा नियमन हुनुपर्छ ।

केही वर्षअघि इण्डियाको मोस्ट वान्टेड अब्दुल करिम टुण्डा काठमाडौंको सीतापाइलामा पक्राउ परेका थिए । उनलाई नेपालले अनअफिसियल सुपर्दगी गरेको थियो ।

Khula Sima-3

उनी नेपालमा कसरी प्रवेश गरे त ? खुला सीमा भएकाले म भारतीय हुँ भने, पसे । वास्तवमा उनी भारतमै मोस्ट वान्टेड थिए । खुला सीमाको दुरुपयोग यसरी भइरहेको छ ।

भारतले जहिले पनि भनेको छ कि तेस्रो देशबाट नक्कली भारु आउँछ, अनि नेपालबाट स्थलमार्ग हुँदै भारत प्रवेश गर्छ । बिहारका तत्कालीन मुख्यमन्त्री नितीशकुमारले भनेका थिए – नेपालबाट प्रवेश गरेको नक्कली भारुले बिहारको अर्थतन्त्र चौपट गर्‍यो ।

खुला सीमा दुरुपयोग गरेर मानव तस्करी भएको छ । हिजोआज बम्बईको कोठीमा मात्र होइन नेपालीहरु इराक, इरान अर्जेन्टिनासम्म पुर्‍याइएको छ । भारतको बाटो हुँदै अन्य देशमा लगिएको छ ।

खुला सीमा भएकै कारण लिपुलेक, कालापानी र लिम्पियाधुरामा सीमा मिचिएको हो । सन् २०१५ मे १५ मा भारत र चीनले नेपालको सम्प्रभुता इग्नोर गरेर लिपुलेकको बाटो हुँदै ब्यापार वाणिज्य अभिवृद्धि गर्ने सम्झौता गरे ।

कालापानी नेपालको हो, भारतले अतिक्रमण गरेको भन्ने चीनलाई पनि थाहा छ । तर दुई देशको स्वार्थ मिल्दा चीनले पनि नेपालको सार्वभौमसत्ताको बेवास्ता गर्‍यो । नेपालको सार्वभौमसत्तामा आघात पार्न चीन पनि पछि पर्दैनरहेछ भन्ने यो गतिलो उदाहरण हो ।

Buddhinarayan-shrestha

कहिलेदेखि खुला ?

नेपाल र भारतबीचको सीमाना जटिल र विश्वकै लागि अध्ययनयोग्य छ । पहिला नेपाल र भारतबीचको सीमाना बन्द थियो, पछि नियन्त्रित भयो, त्यसपछि खुला हुँदै अहिले त हृवाङ्ङै भएको छ ।

सुगौली सन्धीअघिसम्म नेपाल र भारतबीचको सिमाना बन्द थियो । सुगौली सन्धीपछि विस्तारै श्री ३ महाराजको अनुमति लिएर नेपालमा भारतीय कार्यालयहरु खुल्न थाले ।

त्यसपछि नजादिँदो तरिकाले खुला हुँदै गयो ।

ब्रिटिटिस रेजिमेन्टलाई नेपाली लक्का जवान केटाहरु भर्ना गर्नु थियो । उनीहरुलाई विदामा घर आउन जान सीमाना खुला गर्दै गयो भारतले । त्यसलाई नेपाली प्रशासनले पनि रोकेन ।

भारतलाई नेपाली जडिबुटी लैजानु थियो । चारकोसे झाडी अन्धाधुन्ध काटेर रेलवेको सिल्पर बनाउनुथियो । नेपालले किन लग्यौ भन्न सकेन ।
नेपालबाट पशुका छाला भारतको कारखानामा पेलेर फिनिस प्रोडक्ट बनाउन भारतकै तर्फबाट सीमा खुला हुँदै गयो ।

सीमा खुला गर्न नेपाल र भारतबीच कुनै सन्धी, सम्झौता भएकै छैन । मेरो अध्ययनमा त्यस्ता कुनै लेखोट, सन्धी सम्झौता भएकै छैन । दुबै देशले बेवास्ता गरे । यसरी नै चल्दै चल्दै आयो ।

२०११ वैशाख ६ गतेको राजपत्रमा भारतबाट प्रवासी नेपाली पनि नेपाल आउँदा परमिट लिएर आउनुपर्छ भन्ने लेखिएको छ । अहिलेसम पनि त्यसलाई कुनै निर्णयले काटिएको छैन ।

नेपालको अध्यागमन ऐन र नियमावलीमा नेपालीबाहेक अन्य पक्षलाई राहदानी वा परिचयपत्रविना आवत-जावत गर्न नपाइने उल्लेख छ ।
नेपाल र भारतको प्रवुद्ध व्यक्ति समूहले २ वर्षसम्म काम गरे । असार २० गते अवधि सकियो । उहाँहरुले प्रतिवेदन बुझाउन खोज्नुहुन्छ, सरकारले बुझ्न मानेको छैन । प्रवुद्ध व्यक्ति समूह (ईपीजी) ले एक हप्तामा बुझाउँछौं भनेको थियो । अहिलेसम्म बुझाइएको छैन ।
ईपीजीको प्रतिवेदनमा के होला ? अहिले धेरैलाई चासो छ ।

मलाई जानकारी भएसम्म ईपीजीको पाँचौं बैठकमा भारतका तर्फबाट सदस्य रहेका डा. भीसी उप्रेतीले ठाडै प्रपोज गर्नुभयो- दुई देशबीचको सीमा नियमन हुनुपर्छ । ७० वटा आवागमनका नाका बनाउनपर्छ, परिचयपत्र बनाएर आवत-जावतको व्यवस्था मिलाउनुपर्छ भन्नुभयो ।

Khula Sima-5

ईपीजीमा नेपालतर्फका सदस्यहरुले पर्सामा सीमानातिरका वासिन्दाको धारणा बुझ्दा पनि खुला सीमानाले विकृति ल्याएको छ, नियमन हुनुपर्छ भनेर अधिकांशले भने ।

भारततर्फबाट ईपीजीका प्रवक्ताले अहिले आएर किन त्यसो भने होलान् ? भारतका धेरै नेताले नेपाल भारतबीचको सम्बन्ध सन् १९५० को शान्ति तथा मैत्री सन्धीमा आधारित छ । सीमामा गडबड भयो भने दुई देशको सम्बन्ध खत्तम हुन्छ, खुला सीमा चलाए सम्बन्ध गल्र्याम-गुर्लम हुन्छ भन्थे । अहिले भारतले नै किन सीमाना नियमन गर्नुपर्छ भन्यो ?

मेरो बुझाइ के छ भने नेपालमा चिनियाँ परियोजनाहरु धेरै आए । ती परियोजना भारतको सीमा नजिक दक्षिण क्षेत्रमा पनि पुगेका छन् । उदाहरणका रुपमा गौतमवुद्ध एयरपोर्ट, भेरी बबई आयोजनालगायत ।

चिनियाँ नागरिक नेपालका जनजातिजस्ता देखिन्छन् । त्यस्ता चिनियाँहरु नेपाली भनेर भारत प्रवेश गरे भने भारतको सुरक्षा निकायको मुटु छाम्छ भनेर भारतले सीमाना नियमन हुनुपर्छ भनेको हो कि ?

इस्लामिक स्टेटका आतंकवादीहरु नेपाल हुदै भारत पस्छन् कि भन्ने भारतलाई चिन्ता छ । नेपाललाई पनि त्यही चिन्ता छ । त्यसैले अब सीमा नियमन गर्नुपर्छ ।

मेरो विचारमा पनि भारतसँगको सीमालाई कुनै पनि हालतमा खुला छाड्नुहुँदैन । पहिले काठमाडौंबाट दिल्ली जाँदा राहदानी लिनुपथ्र्यो, मेरी हजुरआमा दिल्ली जानुपर्दा राहदानी लिनका लागि म नै गएको थिएँ । त्रिभुवन राजपथ बनेपछि भने नेपाल भारत सीमा हृवाङ्ङै भयो । अब यसरी जानुहुँदैन नियमन गर्नुपर्छ ।

इस्लामिक स्टेटका आतंकवादीहरु विश्वब्यापी छन् । कहिले अमेरिकामा, कहिले बेलायतमा हमला गरिरहेका छन् । डेढ वर्षअघि बंगलादेशमा आईएसको हमलामा २० जना मारिए, पाकिस्तानमा ५ जना मारिए ।

Khula Sima-4

इस्लामिक स्टेटका आतंकवादीहरु नेपाल हुदै भारत पस्छन् कि भन्ने भारतलाई चिन्ता छ । नेपाललाई पनि त्यही चिन्ता छ । त्यसैले अब सीमाना नियमन गर्नुपर्छ ।

पहिले नेपाल र भारतबीचको हवाई सीमाना पनि खुला थियो । तर, सन् १९९९ मा नेपालबाट उडेको इन्डियन एयरक्राप्ट अपहरणमा परेर अफगानिस्तानको कान्दाहारमा पुर्‍याइएपछि भारतले आफ्नो जहाजमा आफ्नै सुरक्षाकर्मी राख्न थालेको छ ।

के अब सतह मार्गलाई पनि नियमन गर्नका लागि त्यो हवाइ दुर्घटनाभन्दा ठूलो घटना पर्खेको हो ? त्यसैले त्यस्तो दुर्घटनाअघि नै खुला सीमानालाई नियमन गर्दै जानुपर्छ । सीमालाई नियमन गरेर क्रमिक रुपमा सीसीटीभी राख्नुपर्छ ।

तर, नेपालले चाहे पनि नचाहे पनि नियमन सुरु भइसकेको छ । नियमन गर्ने काम भारतले नै सुरु गरेको छ । भारतले नेपालको सीमा क्षेत्रमा ४५ हजार एसएसबी खटाएको छ । यो हिसाबले एक किलोमिटर क्षेत्रमा २४ जना एसएसबी खटिन्छन् ।

हाम्रो नेपालमा ६ हजार जना सशस्त्र प्रहरी तैनाथ गरिएको छ । यस हिसाबले एक किलोमिटरको दूरीमा ३ जनामात्रै पुग्छ । भारतमा बोर्डर अब्जरभेसन पोस्ट २०० वटा छ भने नेपालमा ९० वटामात्रै छ ।

Khula Sima-7

उनीहरुको सीमाको १ किलोमिटर नजिकै पोस्ट छ नेपालको २ किलोमिटर पर छ । नेपाली सुरक्षाकर्मी छाप्रोमा बस्नुपर्ने बाध्यता छ ।
विदेहमा अन्य देशहरुमा पनि खुला सीमाना छ । क्यानडा र अमेरिकाको सीमा पनि खुला हो । तर त्यहाँ आवतजावत गर्दा परिचयपत्र देखाउनुपर्छ ।

दुई देशको सीमा सुरक्षालाई ध्यान दिने हो भने अबको १०/१५ वर्षपछि सिमानामा काँडेतार नै लगाउनुपर्छ । तर १८० ठाउँमा आवागमनको नाका हुनुपर्छ ।

यति गर्नका लागि ठूलो दुर्घटना, इस्लामिक स्टेटको आक्रमण पर्खिनु हुँदैन । भारतीय जाली नोट नेपालबाट भारत गएर भारतको टाउको नदुखाउन गर्नुपर्छ ।

Khula Sima-1

(बुधबार काठमाडौंमा आयोजित खुला सीमाना : अवसर चुनौती विषयक कार्यक्रममा श्रेष्ठले दिएको मन्तव्यको सारसंक्षेप)

 

 

N I P A U L : Tista-Kangra.

N I P A U L : Tista-Kangra

Buddhi Narayan Shrestha

Nepaul

Human Rights of Frontier Inhabitants.

Human Rights of Frontier Inhabitants

Buddhi Narayan Shrestha

Simama Basobas

Case Study : International Boundary Survey and Demarcation of South-eastern portion of Nepal with India

Case Study :

International Boundary Survey and Demarcation of South-eastern portion of Nepal with India

 

– Buddhi Narayan Shrestha*

Kathmandu, Nepal

 Presentation-5

(Paper Presented to the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) 26th World Congress held in Istanbul, Turkey).

Abstract

Key words: Masonry boundary pillar, permanent pillar, main boundary pillar, reference pillar, treaty, historical maps, Mechi River, tri-junction, status, demarcation, disputes, white paper.

 

Background

The Himalayan Republic of Nepal is situated between two emerging Asian giants, India and China. The frontier of Nepal is surrounded on its south, east, and west by India, and on the north by China. Nepal is elongated at the east-west in a rectangular shape. The Himalayan range is a natural wall between Nepal and China. There are neither natural walls nor man-made fences along the Indo-Nepal border. The flat Indo-Ganges flood plain extends from India towards the Nepali frontier. The less porous barrier border has challenged the identity of Nepal at the local and national level.

Picture1

 

In 1745 Prithvi Narayan Shah the Great initiated the unification of various petty kings, small kingdoms and principalities of the Himalayan region. He formally established Nepal as a Himalayan State on November 17, 1769.[1] His descendants continued the unification movement; in 1806 Nepal’s border was extended from the Tista River on the east to Kangra on the west. Similarly, Nepal was extended up to the confluence of the Gandak and Ganges Rivers to the south, and to Shigatshe and Tashilhunpo Gomba (monastery) across the Himalayas to the north, which falls today in the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR) of China. It was called the ‘Greater Nepal’.

 

gn

 

When India was ruled by the East India Company, British India did not like Greater Nepal as a unified and integrated country. So conflicts emerged regarding the territory between Nepal and British India. Border disputes, claims, and counter-claims intensified, that resulted the 1814–1816 Anglo-Gurkha War. During the border war, British India initiated steps towards establishing a treaty. Finally, the Treaty of Sugauli was signed between Nepal and British India on March 4, 1816. According to this treaty, Nepal lost one third of its territory from Mechi to the Tista River on the east and from Mahakali to Sutlej (Kangra) on the west. The whole plain Tarai region from the Koshi River to the Kali River came under British control.

 

In due course of time, the British regime did return back the eastern  Tarai plains to Nepal from the Koshi River to the Rapti River on December 11, 1816. Additionally, British decided to return the territory called Naya Muluk of the plain areas from the Kali River to the Rapti River on November 15, 1860 which was taken away from Nepal by the stipulations of the Sugauli Treaty. In time, and owing to past developments, the borderline of Nepal has been constricted to the present territory of Nepal-  the Mechi River on the east, the Mahakali River on the west, the watershed of the Himalayan Range on the north, and to the Indo-gangetic plains of the Tarai on the south.

 

Description of the Nepal-India Boundary Line

Regarding the eastern border, the line was delimited by the course of the Mechi River, as mentioned in article 3 (5) of the Sugauli Treaty. It includes the fort and lands of Nagree and the Pass of Nagarcote leading from Morung into the hills, together with the territory lying between that Pass and Nagree. The uppermost eastern boundary, north of the origin of the Mechi River, is delimited to the watershed ridge of the Singhalila Range up to the Jhinsan peak, forming the Nepal-India-China tri-point.

The southern boundary of Nepal starts east from the low lands of the older river course of the Kali River (Mahakali/Sharada) at Khatima of India and Kichka Sundarnagar of Nepal. The borderline runs further eastward and ultimately it goes to meet the Mechi River near Sukhani Lodabari of Nepal and Kado Gaun of India, as the easternmost border point. It forms the southern borderline of the territory of Nepal. This is the Nepal-India boundary of present Nepal.

 

Nepal-India Boundary Demarcation

History tells that the boundary line between the two countries was surveyed and demarcated in the years 1816 to 1820, 1860, 1880-1886, 1906, 1920-24, 1940–41; in nine sectors erecting boundary pillars, from Phalelung to Brahmadeo Mandi. The demarcation work started from east to west. In the first stretch, 26 jumbo pillars from Phalelung to Antu Hill and an additional 120 pillars from the origin of the Mechi River to Bhadrapur were constructed. It continued south from Bhadrapur and then westward to the Koshi, Lakhandehi, Uriya, and Narayani Rivers along the second to the fifth sectors, and 101, 113, 73, and 61 pillars were erected, respectively. It was further extended to Arrah Nala, Tal Baghaura, and the Sharada River and ultimately to Brahmadeo Mandi as the ninth and last stretch erecting 72, 95, 211, and 41 pillars, respectively, along the boundary line. However, the survey and demarcation works north of Mandi and Phalelung were not completed during the British regime in India.

Boundary maps were prepared on the basis of field survey. The first boundary map was published in January 1818 depicting the south-eastern portion of Nepal with British India, which consists of river segment. Symbol of boundary pillar was drawn on the map and the very symbol was mentioned in the reference section of that map.

Explanation

 

Issue

The border demarcation work between Nepal and India was started after the Treaty of Sugauli (ratified on 4 March 1816). Surveying and demarcation of border with pillars had been started just after monsoon season of 1816. The border line was divided into nine segments starting from point A to K. Point A was located at Phalelung of Panchthar district as the tri-junction of Sikkim, Bengal and  Eastern Nepal, whereas the last station K was established at Brahmadeo Mandi of Kanchanpur district of western Nepal. North of Phalelung to Jhinsan Chuli in eastern Nepal and north of Brahmadeo Mandi to the origination point of the river Mahakali in western Nepal were not demarcated at that time. The survey and demarcation work was not completed during the British India period. The reason for not demarcating on these two segments in those days may be that it is the mountain deep river bed of Mahakali on the west and natural Singhalila mountain range is elongated on the eastern border adjoining Sikkim.

The total number of masonry main boundary pillars as Jange (Jumbo) pillars, erected by the British surveyors, were 913 from A to K segments.

Jange map

 

Disputes and Conflicts between Nepal and India

During the British India period, British Surveyors had erected masonry (Jumbo) pillars with a distance of 5 to 7 Miles. The actual borderline was not straight between two pillars. It was somehow curved jig-jag in some portions. In course of time there were conflicts and disputes on the lands between the inhabitants of two countries as the boundary was blurred. Portions of the line are sharply bent in between boundary pillars, thus creating ambiguity regarding the exact boundary location. A No-man’s land having a ten-yard width (Das Gaja) on both the sides of the Jange pillars was not maintained in these areas. Later, these were the causes of disputes in some spots.

On February 25, 1981 Nepal and India made an agreement to work jointly to make the boundary more clear, to settle the disputes and maintain the borderline. To materialize the agreement ‘Nepal-India Joint Technical Level Boundary Committee’ (NIJTLBC) was formed. The Joint Technical Committee (JTC) demarcated 97 percent of the total 1,880 km-long Indo-Nepal border line within a period of 26 years- 1,233 km as a land boundary and 647 km as a river boundary.[1] There are 60 rivers, streams, rivulets, and brooks that act as Border Rivers. The main rivers are Mahakali, Narayani, Mechi, Rapti, Ghongi Uriya, Jamuni, Arrah, and others. 182 strip-maps were prepared at a scale of 1:15,000, covering half a kilometre width on each side of the border line.

The JTC delineated 8,853 boundary pillars, including Jange masonry pillars, on the maps, 873 of which are main; and 7,980 are subsidiary and minor pillars. It is notable that 4,193 subsidiary and minor pillars are yet to be constructed on the ground. Half of these pillars fall in the river sectors.

Subsidiary and minor pillars were established between two masonry Jange pillars during joint demarcation. But Masonry Permanent Pillar (PP-1), erected just on the eastern bank of River Mechi, was not given status as the Main Boundary Pillar, while making clear the boundary during 1995-96 field season. This is the main issue dealt in this paper.

The Map of 1874 on the Scale 4 Inch to 1 Mile, prepared in Persian language, was taken as the basis map. The Indian side claimed that the course of the river Mechi shown on this map must be taken as the boundary line between two countries, as masonry pillars are only the reference pillars to the river. So they erected small size pillar, 475 meter west towards Nepal side as numbered from 101/1. Nepal government did not protest formally. But local people protested mentioning, masonry Jange pillar is the main boundary pillar since last 200 years, and it is not the reference pillar (RP). Whether the masonry boundary pillar (PP-1) is the main boundary pillar or just a reference pillar has been the bone of contention.

 

Case study

The masonry boundary pillar was named Jange Pillar after the name of Prime Minister Janga Bahadur Rana (1846-1877). Since then, the Nepalese people used to call these pillars Jange pillars, and Jange became synonymous to a masonry boundary pillar. Jang Bahadur maintained all main boundary pillars (BP) of the same shape and size along the border line with India. He painted white with lime water on those pillars that were constructed also before his regime.

 

Description of Jange pillar

Jange pillars as the masonry pillars (PP) are considered the main boundary monuments. The construction of masonry boundary pillars was started just after the Treaty of Sugauli-1816, with a view to demarcate the border between Nepal and India. It is regarded as the main boundary pillar with its massive shape and large size.

In the map, the dimension of Jange pillar as 2.2 metres in height and its diameter as 3 metres in round shape have been mentioned. Its foundation is 1 mtr deep under a rectangular platform of 1 mtr x 1 mtr. The pillar is constructed with bricks, mortar of brick-powder and limestone and glued materials. It is a pre-cast monument homogenously round in shape with its top round and smooth slope. A ditch normally 2.5 mtr deep and 1.5 mtr wide is dug around the pillar to protect it from man, animal and other objects. It is painted with lime water to be seen distinctly from far off distances. In the explanation index of the map entitled ‘British Boundary on the Northern Frontier of Zillah of Poornneea in North Behar-AD 1818’ the dimensions (shaft, decretion, foundation, width, depth etc.) of Jange pillar have been mentioned with a picturesque drawing. Close to this drawing a sentence “pillars of Masonry along the Boundary connection the Ditch at the angle” has been written. The people believe that Jange pillars are the historical monuments of the border between Nepal and India. These are the pre-cast pillars having its serial number inscribed on the upper portion, as the pillar PP-1, is located east of Bhadrapur, Jhapa district on the way to Galgalia railway station, India.

 

full map2

 

Field verification

During the ground inspection and field study, it is found that the masonry (Jange) pillar number PP-1 is located on just eastern bank of Mechi River. The foundation of the pillar underneath the ground is  1.5 x 1.5 x 1 meter and there is a platform of 1 x 1 x 0.75 meter above the foundation. Length of the pillar above the platform is 2 meter high having 3 meter round diameter. There is a small ditch on the eastern part of pillar platform. Indian metalled road starts from the ditch point and it leads to their Galgalia Railway Station. The PP-1 acts as the Tri-junction point, which represents the border of Nepal, Indian States of Bihar and West Bengal. Maps of 1818, 1874, 1932 and 1996, as available were verified on the ground. Bridge on the river Mechi is being  half constructed by Nepal to connect Bhadrapur to Masonry Pillar PP-1 that leads to  Indian road to Galgalia. The local people say that masonry pillar is regarded as the boundary pillar since their ancestors.

jange pillar

 

Analysis

The Nepalese people believe that Jange pillars are the main boundary monuments erected on the boundary line between Nepal and India. But field level Indo-Nepal joint border survey team regarded the Jange as the reference pillar (RP), while they were working on the Mechi riverine sector during November-December 1995. The team was demarcating the then course of the river Mechi with the help of a map of 1874 AD that bears the heading and internal details on Persian script. They started to erect new boundary pillars in the Bhadrapur area of Jhapa district ignoring the masonry Jange pillars, as existing main BPs. By this action, the boundary line has been shifted towards Nepal nearly one kilometre west of Jange permanent pillar (as it is inscribed PP-1) constructed by British Surveyor in 1817. Due to the erection of new pre-cast small pillars, Nepalese territory has been encroached. As a result, half of the compound of Bhadrapur high school came under Indian territory. This caused much hue and cry not only among the local people of Bhadrapur but also other parts of the Nepal, including the capital city and it became the national issue. In the mean time Bhadrapur municipality issued a white paper highlighting the issue and problem.

sweta

After these activities, Chief District Officer of Jhapa made a public notification on March 21, 1998 that it will be examined by the Nepali Survey Team at first and the matter will be put in the next joint meeting of Nepal-India Survey Team. At the joint meeting it was decided that the issue would be resolved in a spirit agreeable to both the sides after the joint field inspection.

 

When I study the map of 1818, scale 1 Inch to 2 Miles, entitled ‘Survey of British Boundary on the Northern Frontier of Zillah of Poorneea in North Behar’ symbol of masonry pillars have been drawn on the map and the very symbol is mentioned in the reference section of that map. On the right hand side of the symbol, it is written ‘Pillar of Masonry along the Boundary connecting the ditch at the angles.’ This map has been verified that all the masonry pillars from number 1 to 5 along the Mechi river have been erected on the eastern bank of the river, as depicted on the map. Pillar number 4 and 5 have been partially damaged. On top of that sketch, it is also written ‘The Red Line denotes the British Boundary and ditch which is 6 feet wide and 6 feet deep.’

Heading 1818 map Cropped

Persian Map of 1874, scale 4 Inch = 1 Mile, depicts that the river Mechi is meandering nearly 475 to 1250 meters in five loops (Loop-1= 0.176 sq meter, Loop-2= 0.352 sq meter,  Loop-3= 0.075 sq meter, Loop-4= 0.880 sq meter and Loop-5= 1.056 sq meter) towards Nepal from the PPs, in the form of roughly an English alphabet ‘C.’ Subsequent maps of 1932 and 1996 follow the river course as shown in 1874 map. If we take the PPs as main boundary pillars, it computes that 2.54 sq km area of Nepal has been encroached.

 

Conclusion

To resolve the status of Jange pillar whether it is the main boundary pillar or a reference pillar, one has to know the construction criteria of these pillars. In this respect, there may be a question as what is the difference between BP and RP or what are the ingredients to make it different from the other.

It is defined that ‘main boundary pillars have been erected at intervals of about five kilometres with intermediate or auxiliary pillars at interval of about 500 metres’.[1] These pillars will be established in the main chainage of the border line to create the line of sight between the two main pillars. To recognize its status, the main boundary pillars are automatically larger in shape and size in comparison to intermediate and reference pillars.

 

On the other hand, the reference pillars have been defined as ‘Reference Marks: when there is any possibility of temporary or permanent marks being moved and it is desired to be (st) able, at any future time to replace them in the exact positions in which they were originally, they should be carefully referenced’

According to this definition, Jange (Jumbo) pillar located east of Bhadrapur on the Mechi River segment must be regarded as the main boundary pillar (BP). Followings are the points to honour the status of main boundary pillars (BP) to the masonry Jange pillars:

  • On the map of 1818 (British Boundary on the Northern Frontier of Zillah of Poornneea in North Behar) PP is written on the Jange pillar and PP is mentioned as Masonry Permanent Pillar.
  • There is no difference between the Jange pillars of riverine and land sectors. No categorization has been mentioned in the legend, index, explanation and marginal information of the map regarding the pillars.
  • If the PP-1 at Bhadrapur area is supposed to be as RP, there must be its main BP. But there are no such pillars larger than Jange pillar on and around the area.

So the PPs must be given status as the main boundary pillars between Nepal and India. Because all the pillars are on the eastern bank of the river Mechi. If these are only the reference to the river, the pillars should have on the left and right banks alternatively. Secondly, the pillars of same size and shape have been given the status of main boundary pillars from number 6 onward and also other segments of the boundary line. Thirdly, the PP-1 is established as the Tri-junction point of Nepal, Bihar and West Bengal. Fourthly, all the pyramidical pillars, which are smaller than PP in size, located on the north of PP-1, have been regarded as the main boundary pillars. Fourthly, PP is larger in shape and size than the pyramidical shaped pillars.

jange junglekrishna jange

 

 

 

 

Pudko

 

In the light of these points and technical facts, all 913 Jange (Jumbo) pillars erected during the British regime in India belong to the same status of main boundary pillars (BPs), no matter whether these are located in land sector or riverine sector along the boundary between Nepal and India. Due to all these ground reality, the 1818 map must be taken as the basis map, and the masonry permanent pillars (PPs) established on the ground must be given status as Main Boundary Pillars in the south-eastern portion of boundary between Nepal and India.

FIG Country Presidents Meeting

References

  1. Aitchison, C.U. (1929), A Collection of Treaties Vol. VIV, Calcutta, India.
  2. Bhasin, Avtar Singh, (1994), Nepal’s Relations with India and China, Siba Exim India.
  3. Indian Aggression on Nepal (1994), Informal Sector Service Center, Kathmandu.
  4. Pant, Shastra Dutta (2006) Nepal–India Border Problems, Kathmandu.
  5. Singh, Amar K. J. (1988) Himalayan Triangle, The British Library, London.
  6. Shrestha, Buddhi Narayan (2014 Second Edition), Sima Sangram (Border War), Ratna Sagar Publication, Kathmandu,
  7. Shrestha, Buddhi Narayan (2004), Boundary of Nepal ((in vernacular), Kathmandu.
  8. Shrestha, Buddhi Narayan (2003), Border Management of Nepal, Kathmandu.
  9. Shrestha, Hiranya Lal (1998) Indo-Nepal Relations, Kathmandu.
  10. Study Tour Report on Nepal–India Border Issues, (Vol. I-IV, April-May, July-August 2010), Constitution Assembly, IRHR Committee, Kathmandu.

 

 

%d bloggers like this: