Security concern and border management of Nepal



Security Concern and Border Management of Nepal


Buddhi N Shrestha

Spoke as a Guest Speaker at

Nepal Army Command and Staff College,

Serial number 18 Command and Staff Course

in Shivapuri, Kathmandu, 19 October 2011

(Only the points have been noted down)


1. What is security ?

  • Security is a measure taken to guard against sabotage, crime, attack, or escape.
  • It is the protection or the safety of citizens and country’s secrets
  • Security refers to all the measures that are taken to protect or to ensure the life and property of the people and the nation.


2. What is border management ?

  • To facilitate the movement of legitimate people and goods while crossing the international border.
  •   It is to maintain secure borders to meet national legal requirements.


3. Relation between security and border management

  •  These are inter-related in terms of the security of life and property of the people and   nation.


4. Location of Nepal

  • Nepal is situated between India and China
  • Nepal has very good relationship with both countries
  • Nepal’s security concern is sensitive to both neighbors
  • Nepal has its own identity, being located between two emerging nations:
  • America and European countries have shown keen interest on Nepal to obtain information especially of China and India in general

5. Border Management System

System of International Border Management

I.     Open border

II.    Regulated border


III. Closed border

      I. Open border :

–  It refers to a system where a traveler of one country can visit

and move around in another country without any restriction :

e.g. Nepal and India

     II. Regulated border:

–  It is an arrangement under which a traveler / visitor from one country must produce                           travel documents to immigration officer, such as passport and visa :

                      e.g. India and Bangladesh

–   This system makes sure that people can immigrate and emigrate, but only on regulated


     III. Closed border:
It means a system whereby a ban is enforced on cross-border movement of all types :

No traveler can cross the border and enter the neighboring country, no matter how valid             travel document she / he might have possessed.

e.g. North and South Korea.

  • India-Pakistan had closed border from 1999 to  2001.

6. History of border management system of Nepal


  • Nepal-China:

1. It has regulated border system.

– However, Tibetan refugees attempt to cross the border in a disguised manner, to    move to India to see the Dalai Lama and to go to America.

v     Chinese police shot Kelsang Namtso, while trying to cross Nangpa La pass               on 30 September 2006.

v    Nepali police arrested nearly 50 Tibetans during 2010, infiltrated illegally from Lamabagar area of Dolaka district.

2. Visa is not necessary for the inhabitants of 30 km of either side.

–        They can visit the territory of the other frontier.

–        However, compulsory ID card system is introduced since 1 January 2006 due to security reason.

–        China considers crossing a border without a permit, a criminal act, sentence of up to one year.

–        Nepal-china has demilitarized zone 20 km on either side of the border line.

  • Nepal-India:

1. Closed border system: It was prevalent in ancient period, especially for third country   national until 1816 Sugauli Treaty.

2. Controlled border: It was initiated after 1816 for Indian nationals  as well.

3. Open border: Started slowly and unknowingly after the restoration of Naya Muluk in 1860.

  •    to recruit the Gorkha regiment,
  •    to sell finished goods by India up to Tibet,
  •    to import raw materials from Nepal.

– However, passport / permit was necessary to cross  the border.

4. More open border:  After India’s independence in 1947.

5. Wide open border:  After the establishment of democracy in Nepal in 1950.

6. Empty open border: After construction of Tribhuvan Highway in 1957, linking Kathmandu to

Raxaul, Indian frontier town.

7. Closed border / blockade: India unilaterally blocked the border from 23 March 1989 to 30 June


8. Discretionary System:

– India closed unilaterally in some segments during 2004-05:

e.g. Falelung crossing-point (Taplejung-Sikkim)

– Regulated at Bhimnagar crossing-point.

9. Visa system: for the Nepalese, who enters India from third country –

: India asked to produce visa to Nepali national  traveled from third country:

e.g. While Mr. Tanka Lal Shrestha (working in German  Embassy, Kathmandu) was                             traveling from Lahore to Delhi by Indian Airline on 26 January 2005.

10. Regulated border system :

  • For air-passengers since 1 October 2000, after hijacking an Indian aircraft from

Katmandu on 24 December 1999.

  • ID card system has been introduced jointly at Nepalganj-Rupaidiya crossing- point from

1 November 2005.

  This is more or less a multi-faceted picture or a short account of Indo-Nepal border



 So Indo-Nepal border management system consists of a complex one in the world, as history

 tells, an example to make detail study.

In general, there is an open border system between Nepal and India. But, is there any treaty

make the border open ?

1. There is no such treaty, agreement or memorandum.

2. Even Nepal-India Peace and Friendship Treaty- 1950 does not have provision of open border.

3. Indian Embassy, Katmandu has said on 2  July  2004 in response an article of this scribe that:

  • Open border between two countries has not been mentioned in any of the articles of

1950 treaty.

  • But open border is an emblem of most intimate friendship that has existed between both

countries from ancient time to this date.


    So all these facts reveal:

  • There is no black and white document on open border system

between Nepal and India.

Then, how the border is made open ?

  • It is due to the fact that administration of both the sides did not    obstruct to cross the

border without any restriction.

But in the changing situation, open border system has created trouble to maintain peace &

security, law & order in both India and Nepal

7. India has regarded Indo-Nepal border insecure :

  • Due to Infiltration of unwanted elements in a disguised manner (Pakistani, Bangladeshi,

Sri Lankan, Afghani, Irani) misusing open border).

  • Due to Cross-border terrorism, illegal transportation of arms and ammunition.

8. Deployment of SSB :

India has deployed 45,000 Special Services Bureau (SSB) para-military forces along Indo-Nepal   border

– They have a plan to rise to 70,000.

  • After the incidents of September 11, 2001 in USA.
  • Attack on parliament building in New Delhi on 13 Dec. 2001.
  • Explosive incidents in London Railway Stations on 7 July 2005.
  • Serial blasts in New Delhi on 29 October 2005.
  • Mumbai train 7 bombings on 11 July 2006.
  • Maoist rebellion activities for ten years.
  • Nepalese Maoists, shaking hands with Indian Maoists-Naxalites.

Due to security reasons, India has categorized Indo-Nepal Border (1, 808 km) in three segments :

Security Sensitive Border (Kanchanpur to Rupandehi) 9 Nepal District, 725 km

Under Observation Border (Nawalparasi to Jhapa) 13 Nepal District, 780 km

Normal Border (Ilam to Taplejung and Dadeldhura to Darchula) 4 Nepal District, 303 km

On an average:
– India has deputed 25 SSB in the distance of 1 km (1 SSB in 40 meter)
– They have constructed 1 Post in every 5 km

9. Security management by Nepal Police

Nepal Police has categorized Nepal-India border into three segments for security

management proposes, on 16 September 2007, in connection to the election of

Constitutional Assembly :

  •  Highly sensitive border

Parsa – Saptarti= 8 Districts

  •  Sensitive border

Kanchanpur – Chitwan and

Sunsari – Jhapa=12 Districts

  •  Normal border

Ilam -Taplejung and

Dadeldhura – Darchula= 6 Districts

10. Nepal has deployed Armed Police Force (AFP) for border security and customs patrolling:          

–  Originally, Nepal had deputed 410 Nepal Army personnel in 12 Customs Offices                             and 89 Sub-Customs points of Tarai  from 14 March 2001.

–  But it was not for border patrolling.

–  Ultimately, Nepal Government deployed Armed Police Force  for border security and                      stop revenue leakage in 20 districts of Tarai on 5 March 2007 .

Nepal has deputed:

  •  4,740 APF for security and revenue purposes in 20 Tarai districts
  •  There are 66 border observation posts
  •  However,  AFP offices have been established 4 to 5 km inside the border line
  • They have deployed AFP teams on the northern border at Tatopani and Jomsom
  • They are planning to deploy teams at Kimathanka and Tinkar
  •    Nepal has deployed 4 AFP in 1 km whereas India has deployed 25 SSB in 1 km

11. Security concern

1. Nepal herself

  • There are more than 60 underground armed groups in the Tarai of Nepal such as Tarai Cobra, Tarai Defense Army, Tarai Kangaroo Court etc.

– They create horror in the plain areas

– It lapses peace and security of life and property

  • It is mainly due to:

– Nepal-India open border regime

– And also less vigilance on the Nepal-China regulated border

  • Unwanted elements, international terrorists, traffickers of small arms, smugglers, narcotic holders, criminals, abductors cross the open border without any restriction
  • They have adversely affected the security in Nepal


   2. India and China

  • India and China are sensitive on the security concern of Nepal
  •  They don’t want any transit disturbances from the Nepali territory
  • India suspects that Muslim community from southern bordering Madarsa make disturbances to India
  • Similarly, China is beware of anti-China (free Tibet) activities from northern frontier

– Buddhist Monasteries have been constructed in the mountain areas

– New Buddhist monks may create head ache to China

  • In this context, China and India think:

– Nepali security system should not have lapses to satisfy both the countries

  • 3. South Asia
    – Nepal’s security concern has also affected the other countries of South Asia- Parliamentarian Mirza Dil Sadbeg was killed on 29 June 1998 in Kathmandu
    – The shooter crossed over the open and unattained border and then flew to third    country, Bangkok
    – Media entrepreneur Jamim Shah was shot dead on 7 February 2010 by suspected    Underworld Chhota Rajan Group from beyond the border- General Secretary of Nepali Islami Federation Faizan Ahmed was murdered on 26    September 2011 in broad daylight

    – There are other cased of murder, such as central jail yard shooting of Yunus Ansari and      the shooting of a Pakistan Embassy official

    All these shooters fled beyond the border crossing Nepal-India porous international border

4. Western countries

v    United States Country Report on Terrorism- 2009 has cited:

– Large ungoverned space along the Nepal-India border exacerbates the vulnerability and do       security shortfalls

– Extremist group could make Nepal as a transit nation

– Laskar-e Tayyiba member Muhammad Omar Madani traveled through Nepal en-route to     New Delhi in 2010

v    U S Report on ‘Pattern of Global Terrorism- 2003’ mentions:

– Weak border control and poor security infrastructure have made Nepal a transit point for

some outside militants and international terrorists

So Nepal’s border management system is much related to security concern for herself, China, India, and other western countries

12. In order maintain internal and external security system and to make Indo-Nepal border    safe and secure-:

– An alternative measure should be implemented as:

1. Enforcing ID card / passport system.

2. Fencing the frontier.

3. Guarding the border.

1) Enforcing ID card / passport system

Most of the countries of the world have adopted ID Card system

– it is pragmatic for Nepal and India to adopt this system for the security reason.

– Canada and USA has the open border system, but ID has to be produced while                                crossing the border.


2) Fencing the frontier

“ Good fences make good neighbors.”



Good neighbors make good fences too

– It will be not too bad to erect barbed wire fencing between Nepal and India with 180 exit / entry   points. Because:

–        India and Pakistan have common barbed iron fencing (2,912 km).

–        US President signed on a bill on 27 October 2006 to erect fence (1,120 km) between USA and Mexico

– A high wall is being constructed in between Bhutan (Funcholing and Gyalephung) and India (Jayagaon) unilaterally.

–   Wire fence has been raised in 856 km. between India (Tripura) and Bangladesh, etc.

–   India has erected 742 km. wire fencing in Kashmir (Line of Control).

–   Indian State of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has opined on 11 January 2011 in Patna that Indo-Nepal border should be properly fenced to obstruct illegal activities

3) Guarding the border by border security force :

  • This is one of the alternative measures to maintain national security both in Nepal and India.
  • Army men or armed Police Force has an important role to protect the national border.

–           India-Bangladesh and Indo-Pakistan (Line of Control) border

have BSF, whereas Indo-Nepal has SSB

Nepal-India has Armed Police Force.

–           But sometimes military battalions,

guarding the common borderline,

might have confrontation.

      • For example, 16 Indian and 2 Bangladeshi BSF personnel were killed fighting each other on 18 April 2001.

13. Security measures :

For the security reason, the border must be:

  • Restricted for the terrorists.
  • Controlled for smugglers.
  • Checked for criminals.
  • Obstructed for girl traffickers.
  • Stopped for narcotic holders.
  • But it must be regulated for genuine passengers.
  • There should be efficient management for export and import of merchandise legally.
  • Special arrangements must be made for the inhabitants living 5 km either side, to cross the

border many times a day without feeling insecure.

1. Insecure Indo-Nepal border could be made secure with political will and commitment

from both sides.

2. Security concern should be a key dimension of border management between Nepal

and India.

3. Nepal must assure China that there will be no security lapses to stop anti-China

activities (Free Tibet) from the northern frontier of Nepal.

4. Similarly, Nepal must satisfy India that there will be no safe haven for Al-Queda,

Laskare Toyyba and Pakistani ISI agents from the Nepalese soil.


14. Border dispute and encroachment :


  • There were disputes, claim and counter-claims in 32 places in connection to the border demarcation during 1961-62.

– These were Kimathanka, Tinkar, Chhangru, Lapchi, Gauri Sankar, Nangpa                  Bhanjyang, Langtang, Mustang etc.

  • Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) was claimed by China.
  • But all the issues had been settled within a period of two years, with the watershed principle and with a view of mutual respect and Panchasheel.
  • Issue of Sagarmatha was settled in the Prime Minister level.
  • Third joint border inspection to renew the Boundary Protocol is going on from 2006.
  • There is a small issue of the dislocation of border pillar number 57, located north of

Lamabagar area of Dolakha District.

  • Missing pillar 57 was identified recently and the talk has been continued.
  • Next issue is to mention the dual height of Sagarmatha

– Height without snow = 8,844.47 meter

– Height with snow =      8,848     meter


  • There are encroachment, dispute, claim and counter claim
  • at 54 places in 21 districts (out of 26 districts) of Nepal.
  • Total area of issues have been as 60,000 hectare
  • Kalapani-Limpiyadhura, Susta, Sandakpur, Manebhanjyang, Pashupatinagar Thori, Brahmadev, Pyaratal, Chyangthapu, Kabeli-Kabru, Mechi river area etc.

15. Issue of Kalapani-Limpiyadhura encroachment

    • Main issue is the origination of the river Mahakali.
    •  As there is a controversy on the delineation of the source of river Mahakali-

Whether it is originated from:

– Limpiyadhura or


– Lipulek or


– A pond near Kali Temple ?

All the historical maps and documents say that the River Kali has been originated from Limpiyadhura

16. Issue of Susta encroachment

  • Changing of the course of the river Narayani during great floods, is the main cause
  • The area left by the river has been encroached by India
  • Susta is surrounded by India on three sides: east, west and south

The then river course (during the period of the Treaty of Sugauli- 1816) must be identified

and demarcated.

17. Military personnel should be

  • Aware of national boundary.
  • They must act to protect country’s international boundary as Border Security Force.
  • If there is no clear demarcation of international boundary, the state cannot survive.
  • Military cadre should have knowledge of map reading and its handling.
  • They must recognize different type, shape and size of border pillars such as:

– Main boundary pillar (BP)

–  Reference pillar (RP)

–  Subsidiary pillar (SP)

–  Demarcation of boundary line

–  Maintain No-man’s land (Das Gaja)

Mumbai terrorist attack : its impact in Nepal

Mumbai terrorist attack : its impact in Nepal

Triple bomb blasts rocked three busiest and most crowded areas of Mumbai, financial capital of India on the evening rush hour of July 13, 2011. 19 people were killed on the spot and more than 130 injured. 7 people have succumbed to death recently, who were said to be injured. There was a large hue and cry among those who were survived and injured, just after the blast. Blood covered bodies lay on the street and people hugged and wept. Others carried the wounded to taxis to take to the hospital. In connection to this incident, Indian Home Minister P Chidambaram told reporters in New Delhi just after the incident that this was a coordinated attack by terrorists. In the mean time, the administration put entire city of Metropolitan Mumbai on high alert to maintain security.

Nepal’s concern

These events have impacted security concern in Nepal in connection to the ramification of the serial blasts in Mumbai. It was envisaged that Mumbai terrorist could cross the border and may hide in Nepal. It is because that India and Nepal has an open border regime. There are some ungoverned border spaces between two nations as well. So the terrorists and unwanted element could transit from one country to another easily.

In connection to Mumbai blasts, an emergency meeting of the central security committee was held in Singha Durbar, Kathmandu. Nepal government directed to the security agencies to keep vigil on suspects in Nepal-India border and Tribhuvan International Airport. It was also instructed to ensure that the terrorists involved in Mumbai attacks may not use Nepal as their shelter and transit point. To implement the directives, special security arrangements were made along the porous borders and the only international airport.

This proves that large scale incidents in India have undoubted affects on Nepal. Generally, terrorists create havoc in India and they flee into the Nepali territory and vice versa. This is largely due to the fact that there is an open border between two nations.

Heart pinching attack  

It is really a shock that triple bombings were the worst terror attack in three locations of Mumbai within a duration of ten minutes. The first blast struck the crowded bustling Jhaveri Bazar, which is famous for the trading of wholesale gold and jewelry market. A minute later, a second blast hit the busy business district of Opera House, which is called ‘Diamond Hub’ for India’s prosperous diamond exporter. This is also the tourist destination of Mumbai. After ten minutes, the third bomb exploded in the crowded neighborhood of Dadar Kabutar Khana (Pigeon House) junction, where businessmen on their way to the railway station often stop to feed grain to the pigeons.

It was presumed that the bombs were made of ammonium nitrate, an ingredient for fertilizer commonly used in improvised devices with electronic detonators. The first bomb was planted along the road under an umbrella and the second one exploded in a scooter motorbike, and the third one was kept on the roof of a bus stop.

No radical organization has yet claimed responsibility for the attack. However, the Indian government has laid suspicions on the Indian Mujahideen (IM), an underground terrorist group sworn to avenge the massacre of hundreds of Muslims in the neighboring State of Gujarat. On the other hand, India thinks that a remote possibility is the Pakistan-based separatist group Lashkar-e-Taiba, known for its sympathies for al-Qaeda; since LeT has been providing ideological and physical training to the IM for some years.

In response to the incident, some of the countries consoled India on the loss of life of Indian people and called to unite against terrorism. Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State expressed ‘I believe it is more important than we stand with India, deepen our partnership, and reaffirm our commitment to the shared struggle against terrorism.’ Similarly, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hong Lei expressed that ‘China condemns the attack. We are willing to work together with the international community that includes India to combat terrorism.’

Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani expressed their deepest sympathies to the Indian leadership on the loss of lives, injuries and damages to property in Mumbai. Likewise, President Dr. Ram Baran Yadav and Prime Minister Jhala Nath Khanal sent messages to their Indian counterparts describing the blasts as a cowardly act of terrorism. It says ‘Nepal condemns terrorism in all forms and manifestations.’

It is to be noted that those who expressed condolences, they have used the word ‘terrorist.’ It denotes that the perpetrators disregard for national boundaries. So it has to call for strengthening border management to obstruct the terrorists.

Chronology of attacks

This is not the first time that Mumbai has to tolerate such bomb attacks. The November 26-29, 2008 LeT gunmen attacks on two hotels, railway station and Jewish center of Mumbai killed 195 people and 3 hundred 27 were injured. Ten militants laid siege to India’s financial capital for sixty hours and paralyzed the city. Similarly, serial explosions blasted at a time in seven railway stations on July 11, 2006 killed 209 persons and seven hundred wounded. On August 25, 2003, 50 persons died and 244 injured at the explosion in Gateway of India and Jhaveri Bazar area. There were also similar type of explosions and bomb attack in thirteen places around Mumbai Metropolis on March 12, 1993 by Dawood Ibrahim gang. As a result, 257 people risked fatalities and 1100 were injured in the incident. Numerous attacks of smaller scale have occurred in Mumbai too.

Why Mumbai is targeted?

It is well known that Mumbai is the financial capital of India. Not only the people of India, but also the people of the other side of the globe say that Mumbai is the heart of Indian economy and richest city of the nation. It is the palpitation of the progress of India. Some other says, Mumbai is the lifeline of India and it is like a golden bird.

On the other hand, large number of foreigners stays there and Mumbai is home to several powerful organized criminal gangs that run extortion, money laundering and smuggling rackets. There are active real estate and in financing and distributing Bollywood films as well.

India has long been under the threat of militant attacks by a variety of groups including separatists in the north-east Hindu nationalists and Islamists. The Maoist rebels control vast swathes of India’s countryside, the so called ‘Red Corridor.’ The Indian Mujahideen is described by global intelligence firm to carry out low to medium intensity attacks. These groups are eyeing Mumbai as their priority. If Mumbai cracks down, it will affect the economy of entire nation. So Mumbai is soft targeted by the terrorists.

Regulation of border

There is an open border regime between Nepal and India. People of both nations can cross the international boundary without any interrogation. Terrorists and unwanted element may cross the border in a disguised manner as Indian or Nepali inhabitants; as their face, attire, posture and behavior resemble. It has enhanced the cross-border crimes and illegal infiltration year after year.

It is interesting to mention that suspected criminals of 1993 Mumbai bomb attack, Salim Abdul Gani Gazi (alias Asfak Ahmed Shah) and Riyaz Khatri (alias Riyaz Ahmed Lone) were arrested by Kathmandu Metropolitan Police Crime Division in Thamel on September 4, 2008. The Police handed them over to the Indian government on the request of the National Central Bureau (NCB) Interpol, India. The duo happened to be staying in Kathmandu for 12 years in the guise of a manpower agent and an employee at a handicraft store in the city. They would often travel to Dubai and Saudi Arabia under assumed names. This was possible largely, because of the porous border. So the time has come to adopt some alternative measures to replace the existing system, to maintain security in both the nations.

The first alternative measure may be to introduce the identity card system that has to be produced while crossing the international border. Next alternative will be fencing the frontier with 180 exit/entry points. In this context, Indian State of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has demanded that the Indo-Nepal border should be properly fenced to check for illegal infiltration, smuggling of narcotics, fake currency and human trafficking, criminal and other related activities from across the Nepal as well as home grown Red-extremism’ (Times of India, February 4, 2011). It is imminent, with such incidents, that the Nepal-India border be regulated to at least to introduce ID card system and increase the number of Armed Police Force in order to block unwanted people that could not affect Nepal by such incidents occurred in Indian cities.

Boundary related to security concern

%d bloggers like this: